Miro vs Maze (2024 Comparison)
Miro offers a versatile platform for collaboration, with an extensive template library and seamless integrations. Its robust features make it ideal for remote teams.
- Extensive template library
- Seamless integrations
- Robust collaboration features
- Steep learning curve
- Interface can feel cluttered
Free plan?
YesStarting price
$8 per month per member
Maze provides advanced user testing tools and intuitive analytics, making it a valuable asset for UX research and data-driven decision-making.
- Advanced user testing tools
- Intuitive analytics
- Easy to use
- Limited integrations
- Focus on testing only
Free plan?
YesStarting price
$99 per monthWhat is Miro?
Miro is a versatile online collaborative whiteboard platform designed to facilitate brainstorming, planning, and project management. It offers a wide array of templates and tools that help teams visualize ideas and workflows effectively. Whether you're working remotely or in the office, Miro provides a seamless experience for real-time collaboration, making it easier to share ideas and feedback. Its integration capabilities with other tools like Slack and Jira enhance productivity, ensuring that your team stays connected and aligned.
What is Maze?
Maze is a user testing platform that empowers teams to gather actionable insights through rapid testing and validation. It allows you to create tests, surveys, and prototypes to understand user behavior and preferences. Maze's intuitive interface and robust analytics help you make data-driven decisions, improving your product's user experience. Whether you're a designer, product manager, or researcher, Maze streamlines the testing process, saving you time and resources while ensuring your product meets user expectations.
Pros and Cons of Miro vs Maze
Pros & Cons of Miro
- Miro offers a vast array of templates that cater to various industries and use cases, making it easy for teams to get started quickly and efficiently.
- Miro integrates smoothly with popular tools like Slack, Jira, and Google Drive, enhancing its functionality and making it a versatile choice for teams.
- Miro's collaboration features are top-notch, allowing multiple users to work simultaneously on a board, making it ideal for remote teams.
- Miro's extensive features can be overwhelming for new users, requiring time and effort to fully understand and utilize its capabilities.
- The interface, while feature-rich, can sometimes feel cluttered, making it challenging for users to navigate and find specific tools.
Pros & Cons of Maze
- Maze excels in user testing, providing robust tools for creating tests and gathering insights, making it a valuable asset for UX research.
- Maze offers advanced analytics, providing detailed insights into user behavior and test results, helping teams make data-driven decisions.
- Maze's intuitive interface and straightforward setup process make it easy for teams to get started quickly, with minimal learning curve.
- Maze's integration options are more limited compared to other tools, which may restrict its functionality for teams using multiple platforms.
- Maze's primary focus is on user testing, which may limit its applicability for teams looking for a more comprehensive collaboration tool.
Miro vs Maze: At A Glance
Value to Price
Miro offers a comprehensive suite of features that justify its pricing, making it a valuable investment for teams seeking robust collaboration tools. Its extensive template library and integration capabilities enhance its value proposition. Maze, while slightly less expensive, provides excellent value for user testing and validation, especially for teams focused on UX research. If you're looking for a tool that offers more features for the price, Miro might be the better choice.
Ease of Use
Miro's intuitive interface makes it easy for teams to get started quickly, with minimal learning curve. Its drag-and-drop functionality and user-friendly design are highly praised. Maze also scores high in ease of use, with a straightforward setup process and clear navigation. If you prioritize a tool that's easy to learn and use, Maze could be the better option.
Functionality
Miro excels in functionality, offering a wide range of tools for brainstorming, planning, and project management. Its versatility makes it suitable for various use cases. Maze, on the other hand, focuses on user testing and provides specialized features for creating tests and gathering insights. If your primary need is a multifunctional tool, Miro is likely the better fit.
Scalability
Miro is designed to scale with your team, offering features that support both small and large teams. Its ability to handle complex projects makes it a scalable solution. Maze is also scalable, but its focus on user testing may limit its applicability for larger teams with diverse needs. If scalability is a priority, Miro is the more suitable choice.
Integrations
Miro offers a wide range of integrations with popular tools like Slack, Jira, and Google Drive, enhancing its functionality and making it a versatile choice for teams. Maze also provides integrations, but its options are more limited compared to Miro. If you need a tool with extensive integration capabilities, Miro is the better option.
Customer Support
Miro provides reliable customer support, with various resources available to help users troubleshoot issues. Its support team is responsive and helpful. Maze also offers good customer support, but some users have reported longer response times. If customer support is a critical factor for you, Miro might be the better choice.
Security
Miro takes security seriously, implementing robust measures to protect user data and ensure privacy. Its security features are well-regarded by users. Maze also prioritizes security, with strong data protection protocols in place. If security is a top concern, both tools offer reliable options, but Miro's reputation in this area gives it a slight edge.
Miro vs Maze: A Detailed Breakdown of Key Features
Real-time Collaboration
Miro shines in real-time collaboration, allowing multiple users to work simultaneously on a board, making it ideal for remote teams. Its seamless integration with video conferencing tools enhances the collaborative experience. Maze also offers real-time collaboration, but its focus is more on user testing rather than brainstorming sessions. If your primary need is a tool for collaborative brainstorming, Miro is the better choice.
Template Library
Miro boasts an extensive template library, catering to various industries and use cases, which helps teams get started quickly. Its templates are customizable, allowing for flexibility in design. Maze offers templates as well, but they are more focused on user testing scenarios. If you need a wide range of templates for different purposes, Miro is the superior option.
User Testing
Maze excels in user testing, providing robust tools for creating tests and gathering insights. Its analytics capabilities help teams make data-driven decisions. Miro offers some user testing features, but they are not as comprehensive as Maze's. If user testing is your main focus, Maze is the better choice.
Analytics
Maze offers advanced analytics, providing detailed insights into user behavior and test results. Its analytics tools are designed to help teams understand user preferences and improve their products. Miro also provides analytics, but they are more focused on collaboration metrics. If you need in-depth analytics for user testing, Maze is the better option.
Integration Options
Miro offers a wide range of integration options, connecting seamlessly with popular tools like Slack, Jira, and Google Drive. This makes it a versatile choice for teams using multiple tools. Maze also provides integrations, but its options are more limited. If you need extensive integration capabilities, Miro is the better choice.
Customization
Miro allows for extensive customization, enabling teams to tailor their boards to fit their specific needs. Its customization options are user-friendly and flexible. Maze also offers customization, but it is more focused on test creation and analysis. If customization is a priority, Miro is the superior option.
Pricing Comparison of Miro and Maze
To assist you in making an informed choice, we’ve outlined the pricing plans and essential features of Miro and Maze. This comparison will highlight the best option for your collaborative and testing needs.
Miro Pricing Plans
- Record and share 5 Talktracks for interactive video board walkthroughs.
- Access to 3000+ Miro and community-made templates for quick start.
- Connect with 100+ apps and integrations like Zoom, Slack, Google Drive.
- Try Miro AI with 10 credits per month per team for enhanced productivity.
- 1-click collaborator access with unlimited visitors on public boards.
- Organize and find boards faster with dedicated Spaces for efficiency.
- Recover lost content and content versions with board version history.
- Create and modify with Miro AI - 25 credits per month per member.
- Securely collaborate outside your team with unlimited guests.
- Visualize processes with 2500+ advanced diagramming shapes.
- Import and manage multiple issue types from Jira on our Planner.
- Accelerate workflows with Miro AI - 50 credits per month per member.
- Simplify admin tasks with SCIM, request management, and more.
- Centralized account management and insights for adoption and usage.
- Ensure enterprise-grade security with SSO, domain control, and more.
- Fast-track innovation with Miro AI - 100 credits per month per member.
Maze Pricing Plans
- Up to 7 blocks for comprehensive usability testing.
- 1 study per month to kickstart your research journey.
- 5 seats to collaborate with your team.
- Ideal for individuals starting with usability testing.
- AI question rephrasing to enhance survey quality.
- Conditional logic for dynamic survey paths.
- PRO templates for professional-grade research.
- CSV export for data analysis and reporting.
- Open card sorting for user-centric information architecture.
- Tree testing for evaluating site structure.
- Variant Comparison for A/B testing and optimization.
- Advanced panel targeting criteria for precise participant selection.
Our Rating Methodology
We thoroughly evaluate each collaboration and testing tool, focusing on key aspects like functionality, ease of use, and integrations. By analyzing user feedback and conducting hands-on testing, we ensure our recommendations are reliable. Each factor is weighted by importance to deliver an accurate final rating, helping you make informed decisions.
Miro or Maze: Which One Matches Your Business Needs?
Choose Miro If You Need ...
- Versatile collaboration tool
If you need a versatile collaboration tool that offers a wide range of features and seamless integrations, Miro is the ideal choice. Its extensive template library and robust collaboration features make it perfect for remote teams.
- Extensive template options
If you require extensive template options for various industries and use cases, Miro is the better choice. Its customizable templates help teams get started quickly and efficiently, saving time and effort.
Choose Maze If You Need ...
- Advanced user testing
If your primary focus is on advanced user testing and gathering actionable insights, Maze is the superior option. Its robust testing tools and intuitive analytics make it a valuable asset for UX research.
- Intuitive analytics
If you need intuitive analytics to understand user behavior and improve your product, Maze is the better choice. Its advanced analytics tools provide detailed insights, helping teams make data-driven decisions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which tool is better for remote team collaboration?
Which tool offers more advanced user testing capabilities?
Which tool has a more extensive template library?
Which tool provides better integration options?
Which tool is more user-friendly?
Which tool offers better customer support?
Anastasia Belyh
Anastasia Belyh is a senior tech writer with over 15 years of experience in marketing, sales, and business software. Having worked in investment banking, management consulting, and founded multiple companies, her in-depth knowledge and hands-on expertise make her software reviews authoritative, trustworthy, and highly practical for business decision-makers.
