logo

Wrike vs ActiveCollab (2024 Comparison)

author image
Author

Anastasia Belyh

Last Update

Nov 07, 2024

We earn a commission from partner links on Keevee. Commissions do not affect our editor's opinions or evaluations.

Excellent Value For Price
4.6

0

author image
Wrike

Wrike offers a robust project management solution with customizable workflows and comprehensive reporting. It's ideal for teams seeking a powerful tool to enhance productivity and streamline processes.

  • Robust task management features
  • Highly customizable workflows
  • Comprehensive reporting and analytics
  • Steep learning curve
  • Interface can feel cluttered

Free plan?

Yes

Starting price

$10 per month per user
Excellent Value For Price
4.3

0

author image
ActiveCollab

ActiveCollab provides an intuitive project management platform with excellent collaboration tools and affordable pricing, making it a great choice for creative teams and small businesses.

  • User-friendly interface
  • Excellent collaboration tools
  • Affordable pricing
  • Limited reporting capabilities
  • Less scalable for large teams

Free plan?

Yes

Starting price

$3.17 per month per user

What is Wrike?

Wrike is a versatile project management tool designed to streamline workflows and enhance team collaboration. It offers features like task management, time tracking, and real-time updates, making it ideal for businesses of all sizes. With Wrike, you can easily manage projects, assign tasks, and monitor progress, ensuring that your team stays on track and meets deadlines. Its intuitive interface and robust integrations with other tools make it a favorite among project managers looking to boost productivity.

What is ActiveCollab?

ActiveCollab is a project management software that helps teams organize their work and collaborate effectively. It offers features like task management, time tracking, and invoicing, making it a comprehensive solution for businesses. ActiveCollab is particularly beneficial for creative teams and agencies, providing tools to manage projects from start to finish. Its user-friendly interface and customizable workflows allow teams to tailor the software to their specific needs, enhancing productivity and efficiency.

Pros and Cons of Wrike vs ActiveCollab

author image

Pros & Cons of Wrike

Robust task management features
  • Wrike offers a comprehensive suite of task management features that allow you to create, assign, and track tasks with ease. This makes it an ideal choice for managing complex projects efficiently.
Highly customizable workflows
  • With Wrike, you can customize workflows to suit your specific needs, providing flexibility and control over your project management processes. This feature is particularly beneficial for teams with unique requirements.
Comprehensive reporting and analytics
  • Wrike's reporting and analytics tools provide detailed insights into project performance, helping you make informed decisions and optimize your workflows for better results.
Steep learning curve
  • Wrike's extensive features and capabilities can be overwhelming for new users, requiring time and effort to master. This may be a drawback for teams looking for a quick and easy setup.
Interface can feel cluttered
  • The interface of Wrike can sometimes feel cluttered, especially for users who are not familiar with its layout. This may hinder productivity and require additional time to navigate.
author image

Pros & Cons of ActiveCollab

User-friendly interface
  • ActiveCollab's interface is intuitive and easy to navigate, making it accessible for users of all skill levels. This feature is particularly beneficial for teams looking for a straightforward project management solution.
Excellent collaboration tools
  • ActiveCollab offers a range of collaboration tools that enhance team communication and productivity. These features are especially useful for creative teams and agencies.
Affordable pricing
  • ActiveCollab provides a cost-effective solution for project management, offering a range of features at an affordable price. This makes it an attractive option for small to medium-sized businesses.
Limited reporting capabilities
  • ActiveCollab's reporting features may not be as comprehensive as those offered by other tools, potentially limiting insights into project performance and progress.
Less scalable for large teams
  • While ActiveCollab is suitable for small to medium-sized teams, it may not scale as effectively for larger organizations with more complex project management needs.

Wrike vs ActiveCollab: At A Glance

Decision FactorWrikeActiveCollab
Value to Price
Excellent4.7
Excellent4.4
Ease of Use
Excellent4.5
Excellent4.6
Functionality
Excellent4.8
Excellent4.5
Scalability
Excellent4.6
Excellent4.3
Integrations
Excellent4.7
Excellent4.4
Customer Support
Excellent4.5
Good4.2
Security
Excellent4.6
Excellent4.3
Overall Rating
Excellent4.6
Excellent4.3

Value to Price

Wrike offers a comprehensive suite of features that provide excellent value for the price, making it a cost-effective solution for businesses. ActiveCollab, while slightly less feature-rich, still offers good value, especially for creative teams. If you're looking for a tool with a robust feature set at a competitive price, Wrike is the better choice.

Ease of Use

ActiveCollab shines in ease of use with its intuitive interface, making it accessible for users of all skill levels. Wrike, while powerful, may require a bit more time to master. If you prioritize a user-friendly experience, ActiveCollab is the way to go.

Functionality

Wrike excels in functionality, offering a wide range of features that cater to various project management needs. ActiveCollab, while functional, may not offer the same depth. If you need a tool with extensive functionality, Wrike is the superior option.

Scalability

Wrike is highly scalable, making it suitable for growing businesses and large teams. ActiveCollab is also scalable but may not handle large-scale projects as efficiently. If scalability is a priority, Wrike is the better choice.

Integrations

Wrike offers a vast array of integrations with other tools, enhancing its versatility. ActiveCollab also provides integrations but not as extensively. If you rely on multiple tools, Wrike's integration capabilities make it the preferred option.

Customer Support

Wrike provides robust customer support, ensuring users receive timely assistance. ActiveCollab's support is reliable but may not be as comprehensive. If customer support is crucial, Wrike is the better choice.

Security

Both Wrike and ActiveCollab offer strong security features to protect user data. However, Wrike's security measures are slightly more advanced. If security is a top concern, Wrike is the safer bet.

Overall Rating

Overall, Wrike scores higher due to its comprehensive features, scalability, and robust support. ActiveCollab is a solid choice, particularly for creative teams, but Wrike's overall offering makes it the superior tool for most businesses.

Wrike vs ActiveCollab: A Detailed Breakdown of Key Features

FeaturesWrikeActiveCollab
Task Management
Excellent4.8
Excellent4.5
Time Tracking
Excellent4.7
Excellent4.6
Collaboration Tools
Excellent4.6
Excellent4.7
Customizable Workflows
Excellent4.7
Excellent4.5
Reporting and Analytics
Excellent4.8
Excellent4.4
Mobile App
Excellent4.6
Excellent4.3

Task Management

Wrike's task management features are robust, allowing you to create, assign, and track tasks with ease. The interface is intuitive, making it simple to manage complex projects. ActiveCollab also offers solid task management capabilities, but it may not be as feature-rich as Wrike. If you need a comprehensive task management solution, Wrike is the better choice.

Time Tracking

Both Wrike and ActiveCollab offer effective time tracking features, helping you monitor project progress and manage resources efficiently. Wrike's time tracking is slightly more advanced, providing detailed insights and reports. If time tracking is a priority, Wrike offers a more comprehensive solution.

Collaboration Tools

ActiveCollab excels in collaboration tools, offering features that enhance team communication and collaboration. Wrike also provides excellent collaboration tools, but ActiveCollab's focus on creative teams gives it an edge. If collaboration is key, ActiveCollab is the better option.

Customizable Workflows

Wrike offers highly customizable workflows, allowing you to tailor the software to your specific needs. ActiveCollab also provides customizable workflows, but Wrike's flexibility and range of options make it the superior choice. If customization is important, Wrike is the way to go.

Reporting and Analytics

Wrike's reporting and analytics features are top-notch, providing detailed insights into project performance. ActiveCollab offers reporting capabilities, but they may not be as comprehensive. If you need in-depth reporting and analytics, Wrike is the better choice.

Mobile App

Wrike's mobile app is user-friendly and offers a range of features, making it easy to manage projects on the go. ActiveCollab's mobile app is also functional, but it may not offer the same level of features. If mobile access is important, Wrike's app is the superior option.

Pricing Comparison of Wrike and ActiveCollab

We’ve compiled the pricing tables and highlighted the key features of both Wrike and ActiveCollab to aid in your decision-making process. Let’s explore what each platform has to offer.

author image

Wrike Pricing Plans

Free
For teams getting started
$0

per month

Get Startedright_arrow
Free includes:
  • Manage projects and tasks efficiently with intuitive tools.
  • Visualize tasks using board view for better organization.
  • Utilize table view for detailed task management.
  • Active task limitations apply to manage workload.
Team
For small teams
$10

per month per user

Try For Freeright_arrow
Includes Free, plus:
  • Organize projects with folders structure and nested projects.
  • Unlimited projects, tasks, and subtasks for comprehensive management.
  • Shared space and dashboard for collaborative work.
  • Integrations and open API for seamless connectivity.
Business
For all teams across organization
$24.8

per month per user

Try For Freeright_arrow
Includes Team, plus:
  • Create unlimited request forms for streamlined processes.
  • Resource and capacity planning for efficient workload management.
  • Real-time reports for data-driven decision making.
  • 5 GB storage per user for extensive data management.
Enterprise
For large teams
Contact sales
Request Pricingright_arrow
Includes Business, plus:
  • Custom access roles and admin permissions for control.
  • User audit reports for comprehensive monitoring.
  • 10 GB storage per user for large data handling.
  • Automations with 1000 actions per user per month.
Pinnacle
For teams with complex work needs
Contact sales
Request Pricingright_arrow
Includes Enterprise, plus:
  • Team utilization and performance dashboard for insights.
  • Budgeting and billable hours for financial management.
  • Wrike Datahub with 10,000 records for data centralization.
  • 15 GB storage per user for extensive data needs.
author image

ActiveCollab Pricing Plans

Plus
For Small Businesses
$3.17

per month per user

Try For Freeright_arrow
Plus includes:
  • 10 GB storage for project files and documents.
  • Unlimited projects, tasks, and discussions for seamless workflow.
  • Task dependencies to manage task relationships effectively.
  • Mobile & Desktop Apps for on-the-go access.
Pro
For Large Enterprises
$8

per month per user

Try For Freeright_arrow
Includes Plus, plus:
  • App integrations for enhanced productivity and connectivity.
  • Expense tracking to monitor project costs efficiently.
  • Time reports for detailed time management insights.
  • Advanced reporting for comprehensive project analysis.
Pro + Get Paid
For Developers
$11.75

per month per user

Try For Freeright_arrow
Includes Pro, plus:
  • User availability to plan team schedules effectively.
  • Time estimates for accurate project planning.
  • Company-wide timesheet for comprehensive time tracking.
  • Invoicing and online payments for streamlined billing.

Our Rating Methodology

We rigorously evaluate each project management tool, focusing on key factors like functionality, scalability, and customer support. By analyzing user reviews and conducting thorough testing, we ensure our recommendations meet diverse needs. Each factor is weighted to provide an accurate final rating, helping you choose the best tool for your business.

Decision FactorScoring Weight
Value to Price
20%
20%
Ease of Use
20%
15%
Functionality
20%
25%
Scalability
20%
15%
Integrations
20%
10%
Customer Support
20%
10%
Security
20%
5%

Wrike or ActiveCollab: Which One Matches Your Business Needs?

Choose Wrike If You Need ...

  • Advanced project management features

    If you need a tool with advanced project management features, Wrike is the better choice. Its robust task management, customizable workflows, and comprehensive reporting make it ideal for complex projects.

  • Highly scalable solution

    If scalability is a priority, Wrike is the superior option. Its ability to handle large teams and complex projects makes it suitable for growing businesses and organizations with evolving needs.

Choose ActiveCollab If You Need ...

  • User-friendly interface

    If you prioritize ease of use, ActiveCollab is the way to go. Its intuitive interface and straightforward navigation make it accessible for users of all skill levels, enhancing productivity and efficiency.

  • Affordable pricing

    If budget is a concern, ActiveCollab offers a cost-effective solution. Its affordable pricing and range of features make it an attractive option for small to medium-sized businesses looking for value.

Frequently Asked Questions

author image
Author

Anastasia Belyh

Anastasia Belyh is a senior tech writer with over 15 years of experience in marketing, sales, and business software. Having worked in investment banking, management consulting, and founded multiple companies, her in-depth knowledge and hands-on expertise make her software reviews authoritative, trustworthy, and highly practical for business decision-makers.