Miro vs FigJam (2024 Comparison)
Miro offers a comprehensive platform for team collaboration, with an extensive template library and robust integration options. Its user-friendly interface makes it accessible to all, enhancing productivity and creativity.
- Extensive template library
- Robust integration options
- User-friendly interface
- Can be overwhelming for new users
- Higher cost for premium features
Free plan?
YesStarting price
$8 per month per member
FigJam excels in design collaboration, offering seamless integration with Figma and intuitive design tools. It's an ideal choice for design teams looking to streamline their creative process.
- Seamless Figma integration
- Great for design teams
- Intuitive design tools
- Limited template variety
- Less comprehensive mobile access
Free plan?
YesStarting price
$15 per month per userWhat is Miro?
Miro is a versatile online collaborative whiteboard platform designed to facilitate team collaboration and brainstorming. It offers a wide range of templates and tools that help teams visualize ideas, plan projects, and conduct workshops. Miro's intuitive interface and extensive integration capabilities make it a favorite among remote teams, allowing them to work together seamlessly, regardless of location. Whether you're mapping out a project timeline or conducting a design sprint, Miro provides the flexibility and functionality needed to bring your ideas to life.
What is FigJam?
FigJam is an innovative online whiteboard tool from Figma, designed to enhance team collaboration and creativity. It provides a simple, intuitive interface that allows users to brainstorm, plan, and design together in real-time. FigJam's integration with Figma makes it a powerful tool for design teams, enabling seamless transitions between brainstorming and design execution. Whether you're sketching out ideas or conducting a team workshop, FigJam offers the tools and flexibility to support your creative process.
Pros and Cons of Miro vs FigJam
Pros & Cons of Miro
- Miro offers a vast array of templates that cater to various needs, from project management to brainstorming. This extensive library makes it easy for teams to find the right template for their specific tasks, enhancing productivity and creativity.
- Miro's integration capabilities are impressive, allowing users to connect with a wide range of tools. This flexibility ensures that teams can seamlessly incorporate Miro into their existing workflows, enhancing collaboration and efficiency.
- Miro's interface is designed with user-friendliness in mind, making it accessible to users of all skill levels. Its intuitive design ensures that teams can quickly get up to speed and start collaborating effectively.
- Miro's extensive features and options can be overwhelming for new users, requiring a learning curve to fully utilize its capabilities. This complexity might deter some users from fully embracing the platform.
- While Miro offers a free plan, accessing its premium features comes at a higher cost. This pricing structure might be a barrier for smaller teams or individuals with limited budgets.
Pros & Cons of FigJam
- FigJam's integration with Figma is seamless, providing a smooth transition between brainstorming and design execution. This integration is particularly beneficial for design teams looking to streamline their workflow.
- FigJam is tailored for design teams, offering tools and features that enhance the design process. Its focus on design collaboration makes it an ideal choice for teams working on creative projects.
- FigJam offers intuitive design tools that make it easy for users to sketch out ideas and collaborate on design projects. These tools are designed to enhance creativity and streamline the design process.
- FigJam's template library is more limited compared to Miro, focusing primarily on design-centric templates. This limitation might be a drawback for teams looking for a wider variety of templates for different tasks.
- While FigJam offers mobile access, it is less comprehensive than Miro's. This limitation might affect teams that require robust mobile collaboration capabilities.
Miro vs FigJam: At A Glance
Value to Price
Miro offers a comprehensive set of features that justify its pricing, making it a valuable investment for teams seeking robust collaboration tools. FigJam, while slightly more affordable, provides excellent value for design-focused teams. If you're looking for a tool with extensive features and integrations, Miro might be the better choice.
Ease of Use
Both Miro and FigJam are designed with user-friendliness in mind. Miro's interface is intuitive, but FigJam's seamless integration with Figma makes it particularly easy for design teams to adopt. If ease of use is your top priority, FigJam could be the more suitable option.
Functionality
Miro excels in functionality with its wide range of templates and tools, catering to various collaborative needs. FigJam, while slightly less feature-rich, offers strong design collaboration capabilities. If you need a tool with extensive functionality, Miro is likely the better fit.
Scalability
Miro is highly scalable, accommodating teams of all sizes with ease. FigJam also scales well, particularly for design teams. If you're planning to grow your team or projects, Miro's scalability might be more advantageous.
Integrations
Miro boasts a vast library of integrations, making it easy to connect with other tools. FigJam integrates seamlessly with Figma, which is a significant advantage for design teams. If integrations are crucial for your workflow, Miro offers more options.
Customer Support
Miro provides reliable customer support, ensuring users can resolve issues quickly. FigJam's support is also commendable, though slightly less comprehensive. If customer support is a deciding factor, Miro might have the edge.
Security
Both Miro and FigJam prioritize security, offering robust measures to protect user data. Miro's security features are slightly more advanced, providing peace of mind for larger organizations. If security is a top concern, Miro may be the better choice.
Overall Rating
Miro's overall rating reflects its comprehensive feature set and strong performance across various dimensions. FigJam, while slightly lower in overall rating, excels in design collaboration. If you're looking for a well-rounded tool, Miro might be the better option.
Miro vs FigJam: A Detailed Breakdown of Key Features
Real-time Collaboration
Miro offers exceptional real-time collaboration features, allowing teams to work together seamlessly, no matter where they are. FigJam also excels in this area, particularly for design teams who benefit from its integration with Figma. If you're looking for a tool that enhances team collaboration, both Miro and FigJam are excellent choices, but Miro might have a slight edge for non-design teams.
Template Variety
Miro provides an extensive library of templates, catering to a wide range of use cases from project management to brainstorming sessions. FigJam, while offering fewer templates, focuses on design-centric options. If you need a diverse set of templates for various tasks, Miro is likely the better option.
Design Tools
FigJam shines with its design tools, offering seamless integration with Figma for a smooth design workflow. Miro, while not as design-focused, provides robust tools for general collaboration. If design is your primary focus, FigJam is the superior choice.
User Interface
Both Miro and FigJam offer user-friendly interfaces, but Miro's is slightly more intuitive for a broader range of users. FigJam's interface is tailored for design teams, making it a great fit for those familiar with Figma. If you're looking for a tool with a universally intuitive interface, Miro might be the better choice.
Integration Options
Miro boasts a wide array of integration options, making it easy to connect with other tools in your workflow. FigJam's integration with Figma is a standout feature for design teams. If you require extensive integration capabilities, Miro is the more versatile option.
Mobile Access
Miro offers robust mobile access, allowing users to collaborate on the go. FigJam also provides mobile access, though it's slightly less comprehensive. If mobile collaboration is important to you, Miro might be the better choice.
Pricing Comparison of Miro and FigJam
We’ve compiled the pricing tables and highlighted the key features of both Miro and FigJam to aid in your decision-making process. Let’s explore what each platform has to offer.
Miro Pricing Plans
- Record and share 5 Talktracks for interactive video board walkthroughs.
- Access to 3000+ Miro and community-made templates for quick start.
- Connect with 100+ apps and integrations like Zoom, Slack, Google Drive.
- Try Miro AI with 10 credits per month per team for enhanced productivity.
- 1-click collaborator access with unlimited visitors on public boards.
- Organize and find boards faster with dedicated Spaces for efficiency.
- Recover lost content and content versions with board version history.
- Create and modify with Miro AI - 25 credits per month per member.
- Securely collaborate outside your team with unlimited guests.
- Visualize processes with 2500+ advanced diagramming shapes.
- Import and manage multiple issue types from Jira on our Planner.
- Accelerate workflows with Miro AI - 50 credits per month per member.
- Simplify admin tasks with SCIM, request management, and more.
- Centralized account management and insights for adoption and usage.
- Ensure enterprise-grade security with SSO, domain control, and more.
- Fast-track innovation with Miro AI - 100 credits per month per member.
FigJam Pricing Plans
- Create up to 3 collaborative design files.
- Unlimited personal drafts for individual projects.
- Basic file inspection for reviewing designs.
- Free plan for students and educators.
- Team libraries for shared design assets.
- Advanced prototyping features for complex designs.
- Dev Mode with view annotations and advanced inspection.
- VS Code extension for seamless development.
- Design system analytics for performance insights.
- Branching and merging for collaborative workflows.
- Private plugins for customized tools.
- Centralized file management for organized projects.
- Sync variables to code via REST API for efficiency.
- Dedicated workspaces for team collaboration.
- Guest access controls for secure sharing.
- Seat management via SCIM for streamlined administration.
Our Rating Methodology
We thoroughly evaluate each collaboration tool, focusing on key aspects like functionality, ease of use, and integration capabilities. By analyzing user feedback and conducting hands-on testing, we ensure our recommendations are reliable. Each factor is weighted to provide an accurate final rating, helping you choose the best tool for your needs.
Miro or FigJam: Which One Matches Your Business Needs?
Choose Miro If You Need ...
- Comprehensive collaboration platform
If you need a comprehensive collaboration platform with extensive templates and integrations, Miro is the ideal choice. Its robust features and user-friendly interface make it suitable for teams of all sizes and industries.
- Scalable for growing teams
If you are a growing team looking for a scalable solution, Miro offers the flexibility and capacity to accommodate your expanding needs. Its scalability ensures that you can continue to collaborate effectively as your team grows.
Choose FigJam If You Need ...
- Design-focused collaboration
If you are a design team seeking seamless integration with Figma, FigJam is the perfect fit. Its design-centric tools and features enhance creativity and streamline the design process, making it ideal for creative projects.
- Intuitive design tools
If you need intuitive design tools for brainstorming and collaboration, FigJam offers a user-friendly interface and seamless Figma integration. It's an excellent choice for teams focused on design and creativity.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which tool is better for design teams, Miro or FigJam?
How do Miro and FigJam compare in terms of integration options?
Is Miro more expensive than FigJam?
Which tool offers better mobile access, Miro or FigJam?
Can Miro and FigJam be used for non-design projects?
How do Miro and FigJam handle security and data protection?
Martin Lunendonk
Martin Lunendonk is a senior tech writer specializing in website builders, web hosting, and ecommerce platforms. With a background in finance, accounting, and philosophy, he has founded multiple tech startups and worked in medium to large tech companies and investment banking, bringing deep expertise and reliable insights to his software reviews.
