Figma vs Maze (2024 Comparison)
Figma offers a comprehensive suite of design tools with real-time collaboration and extensive integrations. Its robust capabilities make it a powerful choice for any design project.
- Robust design capabilities.
- Real-time collaboration features.
- Extensive integration options.
- Limited user testing features.
- Can be overwhelming for beginners.
Free plan?
YesStarting price
$15 per month per user
Maze provides excellent user testing tools and seamless integration with design tools. Its intuitive feedback collection makes it invaluable for teams focused on user experience.
- Excellent user testing tools.
- Seamless integration with design tools.
- Intuitive feedback collection.
- Higher cost for advanced features.
- Limited design capabilities.
Free plan?
YesStarting price
$99 per monthWhat is Figma?
Figma is a cloud-based design tool that allows teams to collaborate in real-time on UI/UX design projects. It offers a range of features such as vector graphics editing, prototyping, and design systems management. Figma's intuitive interface and robust collaboration tools make it a favorite among designers and developers alike. It helps streamline the design process, enabling teams to work more efficiently and effectively, regardless of their location.
What is Maze?
Maze is a user testing platform that empowers teams to gather actionable insights from real users. It allows you to create tests, surveys, and prototypes to validate design decisions and improve user experience. Maze's seamless integration with design tools like Figma makes it an essential part of the design process, helping teams make data-driven decisions and enhance their products based on user feedback.
Pros and Cons of Figma vs Maze
Pros & Cons of Figma
- Figma offers a comprehensive suite of design tools that cater to both individual designers and large teams. Its vector editing, prototyping, and design systems management features make it a powerful choice for any design project.
- Figma's real-time collaboration capabilities allow multiple team members to work on a design simultaneously, ensuring everyone is on the same page and can provide instant feedback. This feature is invaluable for remote teams.
- Figma offers a wide range of integrations with popular tools like Slack, Trello, and JIRA, enhancing its functionality and workflow efficiency. This makes it a versatile choice for any design team.
- While Figma offers basic user testing features, it lacks the dedicated focus on user feedback that Maze provides. This can be a limitation for teams prioritizing user testing in their design process.
- Figma's extensive features and capabilities can be overwhelming for new users, especially those without prior design experience. This may require additional training and support for beginners.
Pros & Cons of Maze
- Maze provides powerful user testing tools that help teams gather actionable insights from real users. This feature is crucial for validating design decisions and improving user experience.
- Maze integrates seamlessly with popular design tools like Figma, making it a valuable addition to any design team's toolkit. This enhances its functionality and workflow efficiency.
- Maze excels in feedback collection, providing tools to gather actionable insights from real users. This feature is invaluable for teams looking to improve user experience based on data-driven decisions.
- Maze's advanced features come at a higher cost, which may be a consideration for teams with limited budgets. This can be a limitation for smaller teams or startups.
- While Maze excels in user testing, it lacks the robust design capabilities that Figma offers. This can be a limitation for teams focused on design functionality.
Figma vs Maze: At A Glance
Value to Price
Figma offers exceptional value for its price, providing a comprehensive suite of design tools that cater to both individual designers and large teams. Its collaborative features and extensive plugin library make it a cost-effective choice for design projects. Maze, while slightly more expensive, offers unique user testing capabilities that justify its price for teams focused on user experience. If you prioritize design collaboration, Figma is the better choice.
Ease of Use
Figma's intuitive interface and real-time collaboration features make it easy for teams to work together seamlessly. Its learning curve is minimal, allowing new users to quickly adapt. Maze, on the other hand, excels in ease of use for creating and analyzing user tests, making it ideal for teams focused on user feedback. If user testing is your priority, Maze is the better option.
Functionality
Figma stands out with its robust design capabilities, offering features like vector editing, prototyping, and design systems management. Maze complements Figma by providing powerful user testing tools that help teams gather actionable insights. If your primary need is design functionality, Figma is the superior choice.
Scalability
Figma's cloud-based platform allows for easy scalability, accommodating teams of all sizes. Its collaborative features ensure that as your team grows, your design process remains efficient. Maze also scales well, offering flexible testing options for teams of varying sizes. If scalability in design is crucial, Figma is the better option.
Integrations
Figma offers a wide range of integrations with popular tools like Slack, Trello, and JIRA, enhancing its functionality and workflow efficiency. Maze integrates seamlessly with design tools like Figma, making it a valuable addition to any design team's toolkit. If integration with other tools is a priority, Figma offers more options.
Customer Support
Figma provides reliable customer support through various channels, including a comprehensive help center and community forums. Maze offers support through email and a knowledge base, but its response times can be slower. If prompt customer support is essential, Figma is the better choice.
Security
Figma ensures data security with features like two-factor authentication and regular security updates. Maze also prioritizes security, offering secure data handling and compliance with industry standards. If security is a top concern, both tools offer reliable options, but Figma's additional security features give it an edge.
Figma vs Maze: A Detailed Breakdown of Key Features
Real-time Collaboration
Figma excels in real-time collaboration, allowing multiple team members to work on a design simultaneously. This feature is invaluable for remote teams, as it ensures everyone is on the same page and can provide instant feedback. Maze also offers collaboration features, but its primary focus is on user testing rather than design collaboration. If your team needs to collaborate on design projects in real-time, Figma is the superior choice.
Prototyping
Figma's prototyping capabilities are robust, allowing designers to create interactive prototypes that mimic the final product. This feature is essential for testing and iterating on designs before development. Maze offers prototyping as part of its user testing suite, but its focus is more on gathering user feedback. If prototyping is a critical part of your design process, Figma offers more comprehensive tools.
User Testing
Maze shines in user testing, providing tools to create tests, surveys, and gather user feedback. This feature is crucial for teams looking to validate design decisions and improve user experience. Figma offers basic user testing features, but Maze's dedicated focus on this area makes it the better choice for teams prioritizing user feedback.
Design Systems
Figma's design systems feature allows teams to create and manage consistent design elements across projects. This is essential for maintaining brand consistency and streamlining the design process. Maze does not offer design systems management, making Figma the clear choice for teams focused on design consistency.
Feedback Collection
Maze excels in feedback collection, providing tools to gather actionable insights from real users. This feature is invaluable for teams looking to improve user experience based on data-driven decisions. Figma offers basic feedback collection features, but Maze's focus on this area makes it the better choice for teams prioritizing user feedback.
Integration with Design Tools
Figma offers extensive integration options with popular design tools, enhancing its functionality and workflow efficiency. Maze integrates seamlessly with design tools like Figma, making it a valuable addition to any design team's toolkit. If integration with other tools is a priority, Figma offers more options.
Pricing Comparison of Figma and Maze
We’ve compiled the pricing tables and highlighted the key features of both Figma and Maze to aid in your decision-making process. Let’s explore what each platform has to offer.
Figma Pricing Plans
- Create up to 3 collaborative design files for team projects.
- Unlimited personal drafts for individual work and experimentation.
- Basic file inspection to review and analyze design elements.
- Free access for students and educators to support learning.
- Team libraries for shared design resources and assets.
- Advanced prototyping features for interactive design testing.
- Unlimited version history to track design changes over time.
- Shared and private projects for organized team collaboration.
- Design system analytics to measure design system usage.
- Branching and merging for collaborative design workflows.
- Centralized file management for efficient resource handling.
- Single sign-on for secure and easy access management.
- Sync variables to code via REST API for seamless integration.
- Dedicated workspaces for teams to enhance collaboration.
- Guest access controls for secure external collaboration.
- Idle session timeout for enhanced security measures.
Maze Pricing Plans
- Up to 7 blocks for comprehensive usability testing.
- 1 study per month to kickstart your research journey.
- 5 seats to collaborate with your team.
- Ideal for individuals starting with usability testing.
- AI question rephrasing to enhance survey quality.
- Conditional logic for dynamic survey paths.
- PRO templates for professional-grade research.
- CSV export for data analysis and reporting.
- Open card sorting for user-centric information architecture.
- Tree testing for evaluating site structure.
- Variant Comparison for A/B testing and optimization.
- Advanced panel targeting criteria for precise participant selection.
Our Rating Methodology
We thoroughly evaluate each design tool, focusing on key aspects like functionality, ease of use, and integrations. By analyzing user reviews and conducting hands-on testing, we ensure our recommendations fit your needs. Each factor is weighted by importance to deliver a reliable final rating, helping you make informed decisions.
Figma or Maze: Which One Matches Your Business Needs?
Choose Figma If You Need ...
- Advanced design capabilities
If you are a designer or team looking for a tool with advanced design capabilities, Figma is the ideal choice. Its robust features, such as vector editing and prototyping, make it a powerful tool for any design project.
- Real-time collaboration
If you need a tool that allows for real-time collaboration among team members, Figma is the better option. Its collaborative features ensure that everyone is on the same page and can provide instant feedback.
Choose Maze If You Need ...
- User testing focus
If your team prioritizes user testing and feedback collection, Maze is the superior choice. Its powerful user testing tools and intuitive feedback collection make it invaluable for improving user experience.
- Seamless design tool integration
If you need a tool that integrates seamlessly with popular design tools, Maze is the better option. Its integration capabilities enhance its functionality and workflow efficiency, making it a valuable addition to any design team.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which tool is better for real-time collaboration?
Which tool offers better user testing capabilities?
Which tool is more cost-effective?
Which tool offers more integrations?
Which tool is easier to use for beginners?
Which tool offers better design capabilities?
Anastasia Belyh
Anastasia Belyh is a senior tech writer with over 15 years of experience in marketing, sales, and business software. Having worked in investment banking, management consulting, and founded multiple companies, her in-depth knowledge and hands-on expertise make her software reviews authoritative, trustworthy, and highly practical for business decision-makers.
