logo

Buffer vs CoSchedule (2025 Comparison)

No Logo
Author

Anastasia Belyh

Last Update

Jan 31, 2025

We earn a commission from partner links on Keevee. Commissions do not affect our editor's opinions or evaluations.

Excellent Value For Price
4.3

0

No Logo
Buffer

Buffer offers a user-friendly interface and affordable pricing, making it an excellent choice for small businesses and individuals looking to manage their social media presence efficiently.

  • User-friendly interface for beginners.
  • Affordable pricing for small businesses.
  • Strong social media scheduling features.
  • Limited project management capabilities.
  • Basic content planning features.

Free plan?

Yes

Starting price

$5 per month
Excellent Value For Price
4.5

0

No Logo
CoSchedule

CoSchedule provides comprehensive marketing management tools, robust content planning features, and excellent team collaboration capabilities, making it ideal for marketing teams seeking a versatile solution.

  • Comprehensive marketing management tools.
  • Robust content planning features.
  • Excellent team collaboration capabilities.
  • Slightly higher learning curve.
  • Higher price point for advanced features.

Free plan?

Yes

Starting price

$19 per month per user

What is Buffer?

Buffer is a social media management tool that helps users schedule posts, track performance, and manage multiple accounts from a single dashboard. It simplifies the process of maintaining a consistent online presence, allowing users to plan and publish content across various platforms effortlessly. With Buffer, you can analyze engagement metrics to refine your strategy and ensure your content resonates with your audience. It's particularly beneficial for small businesses and individuals looking to streamline their social media efforts without the need for complex tools.

What is CoSchedule?

CoSchedule is a comprehensive marketing management platform designed to help teams organize and execute their marketing strategies efficiently. It offers a suite of tools for content planning, social media scheduling, and project management, all in one place. CoSchedule's intuitive interface and robust features make it easy for marketing teams to collaborate, track progress, and ensure deadlines are met. It's an ideal solution for businesses looking to enhance their marketing productivity and maintain a cohesive brand presence across all channels.

Pros and Cons of Buffer vs CoSchedule

No Logo

Pros & Cons of Buffer

User-friendly interface
  • Buffer's interface is designed with simplicity in mind, making it easy for users to navigate and manage their social media accounts without any hassle. This is particularly beneficial for beginners who may be overwhelmed by more complex tools.
Affordable pricing
  • Buffer offers competitive pricing plans that cater to small businesses and individuals, providing essential features without breaking the bank. This makes it an attractive option for those looking to manage their social media presence on a budget.
Strong social media scheduling
  • Buffer excels in social media scheduling, offering a straightforward and efficient way to plan and publish posts across multiple platforms. Its intuitive interface makes it easy for users to maintain a consistent online presence.
Limited project management
  • Buffer's focus is primarily on social media management, which means its project management capabilities are limited. This may be a drawback for users looking for a more comprehensive marketing management solution.
Basic content planning
  • While Buffer offers some content planning features, they are relatively basic compared to more comprehensive tools like CoSchedule. This may be a limitation for users looking to organize and execute complex marketing strategies.
No Logo

Pros & Cons of CoSchedule

Comprehensive marketing tools
  • CoSchedule offers a wide range of marketing management tools, making it a versatile choice for teams looking to organize and execute their marketing strategies efficiently. Its features cater to various aspects of marketing, from content planning to social media scheduling.
Robust content planning
  • CoSchedule excels in content planning, providing a robust set of tools to organize and execute marketing strategies. Its calendar feature allows teams to visualize their content schedule and collaborate effectively, ensuring deadlines are met.
Excellent team collaboration
  • CoSchedule is designed with team collaboration in mind, offering features that facilitate communication and project management. Its tools allow teams to work together seamlessly, ensuring everyone is on the same page and projects are completed efficiently.
Higher learning curve
  • Due to its extensive features, CoSchedule may have a slightly higher learning curve compared to simpler tools like Buffer. This may require users to invest more time in learning how to use the platform effectively.
Higher price point
  • CoSchedule's comprehensive feature set comes at a higher price point, which may be a consideration for users on a tight budget. However, the investment is justified by the advanced capabilities it offers.

Buffer vs CoSchedule: At A Glance

Decision FactorBufferCoSchedule
Value to Price
Good4.2
Excellent4.5
Ease of Use
Excellent4.5
Excellent4.3
Functionality
Good4.0
Excellent4.6
Scalability
Good4.1
Excellent4.4
Integrations
Excellent4.3
Excellent4.5
Customer Support
Excellent4.4
Good4.2
Security
Excellent4.5
Excellent4.3
Overall Rating
Excellent4.3
Excellent4.5

Value to Price

Buffer offers a competitive pricing structure that aligns well with its features, making it a cost-effective choice for small businesses. CoSchedule, on the other hand, provides a more comprehensive suite of tools, justifying its slightly higher price point. If you're looking for a budget-friendly option with essential features, Buffer is a great choice. However, if you need a more robust solution with advanced capabilities, CoSchedule is worth the investment.

Ease of Use

Buffer is renowned for its user-friendly interface, making it easy for beginners to navigate and manage their social media accounts. CoSchedule, while slightly more complex due to its extensive features, still maintains a relatively intuitive design. If you prioritize simplicity and ease of use, Buffer is the better option. However, if you're willing to invest a bit more time in learning, CoSchedule offers greater functionality.

Functionality

CoSchedule excels in functionality, offering a wide range of tools for content planning, social media scheduling, and project management. Buffer, while more focused on social media management, provides essential features that cater to most users' needs. If you require a comprehensive marketing management platform, CoSchedule is the superior choice. For those focused primarily on social media, Buffer is more than sufficient.

Scalability

Both Buffer and CoSchedule offer scalable solutions, but CoSchedule's extensive feature set makes it more suitable for growing businesses. Buffer is ideal for small to medium-sized businesses looking to maintain a consistent social media presence. If your business is expanding and requires more advanced marketing tools, CoSchedule is the better option. For smaller operations, Buffer provides all the necessary tools without overwhelming complexity.

Integrations

CoSchedule offers a wide range of integrations with popular marketing tools, enhancing its functionality and making it a versatile choice for marketing teams. Buffer also provides integrations, but its focus is more on social media platforms. If you need a tool that integrates seamlessly with your existing marketing stack, CoSchedule is the better option. For those focused on social media, Buffer's integrations are more than adequate.

Customer Support

Buffer is known for its responsive customer support, providing users with timely assistance and resources. CoSchedule also offers solid support, but some users have reported longer response times. If customer support is a top priority, Buffer may be the better choice. However, CoSchedule's support is still reliable and sufficient for most users.

Security

Both Buffer and CoSchedule prioritize security, ensuring user data is protected. Buffer's security measures are robust, providing peace of mind for users managing multiple accounts. CoSchedule also offers strong security features, making it a safe choice for marketing teams. If security is a primary concern, both tools are reliable options, with Buffer having a slight edge in user confidence.

Overall Rating

CoSchedule edges out Buffer in overall rating due to its comprehensive feature set and versatility. However, Buffer remains a strong contender, especially for those focused on social media management. If you need a full-fledged marketing platform, CoSchedule is the better choice. For social media-centric needs, Buffer is an excellent option.

Buffer vs CoSchedule: A Detailed Breakdown of Key Features

FeaturesBufferCoSchedule
Social Media Scheduling
Excellent4.5
Excellent4.3
Content Planning
Good4.0
Excellent4.6
Analytics and Reporting
Excellent4.3
Excellent4.5
Team Collaboration
Good4.2
Excellent4.6
Project Management
Good3.8
Excellent4.7
User Interface
Excellent4.4
Excellent4.3

Social Media Scheduling

Buffer excels in social media scheduling, offering a straightforward and efficient way to plan and publish posts across multiple platforms. Its intuitive interface makes it easy for users to manage their social media presence without hassle. CoSchedule also provides social media scheduling capabilities, but its focus is more on integrating these features with broader marketing strategies. If your primary need is social media scheduling, Buffer is the better choice. However, if you want to incorporate social media into a larger marketing plan, CoSchedule offers more comprehensive tools.

Content Planning

CoSchedule shines in content planning, providing a robust set of tools to organize and execute marketing strategies. Its calendar feature allows teams to visualize their content schedule and collaborate effectively. Buffer, while offering basic content planning features, is more focused on social media management. If content planning is a critical aspect of your marketing efforts, CoSchedule is the superior choice. For those primarily interested in social media, Buffer's offerings are sufficient.

Analytics and Reporting

Both Buffer and CoSchedule offer analytics and reporting features, but CoSchedule provides more in-depth insights into marketing performance. Its reports are comprehensive, allowing users to track the success of their campaigns and make data-driven decisions. Buffer's analytics are more focused on social media metrics, providing essential insights for users managing multiple accounts. If you need detailed marketing analytics, CoSchedule is the better option. For social media-specific insights, Buffer is more than adequate.

Team Collaboration

CoSchedule is designed with team collaboration in mind, offering features that facilitate communication and project management. Its tools allow teams to work together seamlessly, ensuring everyone is on the same page. Buffer, while offering some collaboration features, is more suited for individual users or small teams. If collaboration is a key aspect of your marketing efforts, CoSchedule is the better choice. For smaller teams or individual users, Buffer provides the necessary tools without overwhelming complexity.

Project Management

CoSchedule excels in project management, offering a suite of tools to help teams organize and execute their marketing strategies. Its features allow users to track progress, assign tasks, and ensure deadlines are met. Buffer, while not as focused on project management, provides essential tools for managing social media accounts. If project management is a critical aspect of your marketing efforts, CoSchedule is the superior choice. For those focused primarily on social media, Buffer's offerings are sufficient.

User Interface

Buffer is known for its clean and user-friendly interface, making it easy for users to navigate and manage their social media accounts. CoSchedule, while slightly more complex due to its extensive features, still maintains a relatively intuitive design. If you prioritize simplicity and ease of use, Buffer is the better option. However, if you're willing to invest a bit more time in learning, CoSchedule offers greater functionality.

Pricing Comparison of Buffer and CoSchedule

To assist you in making an informed choice, we’ve outlined the pricing plans and essential features of Buffer and CoSchedule. This comparison will highlight the best option for managing your social media and marketing efforts.

No Logo

Buffer Pricing Plans

Free
For individuals and businesses
$0

per channel

Get Startedright_arrow
Free includes:
  • Access to planning and publishing tools for content.
  • Build a customized landing page effortlessly.
  • Utilize AI Assistant for content ideas and repurposing.
  • Schedule up to 10 posts per channel.
Essentials
For professionals using social media
$5

per month

Try For Freeright_arrow
Includes Free, plus:
  • Analytic reports to track social media performance.
  • Access to 2000 content ideas with AI Assistant.
  • Unlimited scheduling of posts per channel.
  • Custom schedules and tailored posts for each channel.
Team
For teams needing collaboration
$10

per month

Try For Freeright_arrow
Includes Essentials, plus:
  • Draft collaboration tools for team efficiency.
  • Approval workflow tools for seamless content management.
  • Custom access and permissions for team members.
  • Unlimited scheduling and tailored posts for each channel.
Agency
For marketing agencies with channels
$100

per month

Try For Freeright_arrow
Includes Team, plus:
  • Custom access and permissions for agency clients.
  • Agency-friendly pricing for cost-effective management.
  • Unlimited scheduling and tailored posts for each channel.
  • Comprehensive analytic reports for all channels.
No Logo

CoSchedule Pricing Plans

Free Calendar
For Individuals
$0

Free Forever

Get Startedright_arrow
Free Calendar includes:
  • 20 AI Project Templates for generating ideas and drafts.
  • Drag & Drop Calendar for easy rescheduling.
  • Best Time Social Publishing for optimal engagement.
  • Basic Support via email and live chat.
Social Calendar
For Small Businesses
$19

per month per user

Try For Freeright_arrow
Includes Free Calendar, plus:
  • AI Project Assistant for idea generation and drafting.
  • 500+ AI Project Templates for diverse content creation.
  • AI Image Generation for creating visual content.
  • Social Media Automation for recurring promotions.
Agency Calendar
For Agencies
$49

per month per user

Try For Freeright_arrow
Includes Social Calendar, plus:
  • Client Brand Profiles for custom branding.
  • White Label Reports for professional client reporting.
  • Social Approvals to ensure message approval before publishing.
  • Approval Dashboard for reviewing pending social messages.
Content Calendar
For Teams
Contact sales
Request Pricingright_arrow
Includes Agency Calendar, plus:
  • Table View for spreadsheet-style project management.
  • Marketing Campaigns for grouping related projects.
  • Custom Fields for documenting project details.
  • Guest User Access for external contributors.
Marketing Suite
For Marketing Teams
Contact sales
Request Pricingright_arrow
Includes Content Calendar, plus:
  • Approval Workflows for ensuring brand standards.
  • Intake Request Forms for prioritizing requests.
  • Team Management Dashboard for managing team priorities.
  • Digital Asset Management for controlling brand assets.

Our Rating Methodology

We thoroughly evaluate each social media management tool, focusing on key aspects like ease of use, functionality, and scalability. By analyzing user reviews and conducting hands-on testing, we ensure our recommendations align with your needs. Each of the seven evaluation factors is weighted by importance to deliver a reliable final rating, helping you make informed decisions.

Decision FactorScoring Weight
Value to Price
20%
20%
Ease of Use
20%
15%
Functionality
20%
25%
Scalability
20%
15%
Integrations
20%
10%
Customer Support
20%
10%
Security
20%
5%

Buffer or CoSchedule: Which One Matches Your Business Needs?

Choose Buffer If You Need ...

  • User-friendly social media management

    If you are a beginner or small business owner looking for an easy-to-use social media management tool, Buffer is the ideal choice. Its intuitive interface and affordable pricing make it accessible for users with limited experience or budget constraints.

  • Affordable solution for small teams

    If you are a small team or individual seeking a cost-effective solution for managing social media accounts, Buffer offers the necessary features without overwhelming complexity. Its pricing plans cater to smaller budgets while providing essential tools for social media success.

Choose CoSchedule If You Need ...

  • Comprehensive marketing management

    If you are a marketing team looking for a versatile platform to organize and execute your marketing strategies, CoSchedule is the superior choice. Its comprehensive suite of tools caters to various aspects of marketing, from content planning to social media scheduling.

  • Robust content planning features

    If you are a business seeking advanced content planning capabilities to enhance your marketing efforts, CoSchedule provides a robust set of tools to organize and execute your strategies effectively. Its calendar feature allows for seamless collaboration and visualization of your content schedule.

Frequently Asked Questions

No Logo
Author

Anastasia Belyh

Anastasia Belyh is a senior tech writer with over 15 years of experience in marketing, sales, and business software. Having worked in investment banking, management consulting, and founded multiple companies, her in-depth knowledge and hands-on expertise make her software reviews authoritative, trustworthy, and highly practical for business decision-makers.