logo

Balsamiq vs Maze (2024 Comparison)

author image
Author

Anastasia Belyh

Last Update

Nov 16, 2024

We earn a commission from partner links on Keevee. Commissions do not affect our editor's opinions or evaluations.

Excellent Value For Price
4.3

0

author image
Balsamiq

Balsamiq is a user-friendly wireframing tool perfect for beginners. Its intuitive interface and reliable support make it a great choice for early-stage design work.

  • Simple wireframing tool for beginners
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop interface
  • Reliable customer support
  • Limited user testing features
  • Basic feedback analysis options

Free plan?

No

Starting price

$12 per month
Excellent Value For Price
4.5

0

author image
Maze

Maze offers comprehensive user testing and feedback analysis tools. Its seamless integrations and advanced features make it ideal for design teams seeking data-driven insights.

  • Comprehensive user testing capabilities
  • Advanced feedback analysis tools
  • Seamless design tool integrations
  • Higher learning curve for beginners
  • Slightly higher price point

Free plan?

Yes

Starting price

$99 per month

What is Balsamiq?

Balsamiq is a wireframing tool that helps designers and developers create low-fidelity mockups quickly. It simplifies the design process by allowing users to sketch out ideas and iterate on them without getting bogged down in details. This tool is perfect for brainstorming sessions and early-stage design work, making it easier to communicate ideas with team members and stakeholders. With its intuitive drag-and-drop interface, Balsamiq enables users to focus on the big picture, ensuring that the final product aligns with the initial vision.

What is Maze?

Maze is a user testing platform that empowers teams to validate ideas and concepts through rapid testing. It allows users to create tests, gather feedback, and analyze results, all in one place. Maze is particularly useful for UX designers and product teams who need to make data-driven decisions. By providing insights into user behavior and preferences, Maze helps teams refine their designs and improve user experiences. Its seamless integration with popular design tools makes it an essential part of the design process.

Pros and Cons of Balsamiq vs Maze

author image

Pros & Cons of Balsamiq

Simple wireframing tool for beginners
  • Balsamiq offers a straightforward platform for creating wireframes, making it accessible to users with little to no design experience. Its simplicity is one of its greatest strengths.
Intuitive drag-and-drop interface
  • The drag-and-drop interface of Balsamiq allows users to quickly sketch out ideas without getting bogged down in details, making the design process more efficient.
Reliable customer support
  • Balsamiq is known for its responsive customer support, ensuring that users can resolve any issues they encounter quickly and efficiently.
Limited user testing features
  • Balsamiq focuses primarily on wireframing, which means it lacks the advanced user testing features found in other tools like Maze.
Basic feedback analysis options
  • While Balsamiq offers some feedback options, they are not as comprehensive as those provided by Maze, limiting its usefulness for teams seeking detailed insights.
author image

Pros & Cons of Maze

Comprehensive user testing capabilities
  • Maze excels in user testing, offering a wide range of tools to create tests, gather feedback, and analyze results, making it invaluable for design teams.
Advanced feedback analysis tools
  • The feedback analysis tools in Maze provide deep insights into user behavior and preferences, helping teams make data-driven decisions.
Seamless design tool integrations
  • Maze integrates effortlessly with popular design tools, enhancing its usability and making it a versatile choice for design teams.
Higher learning curve for beginners
  • Maze's advanced features can be overwhelming for new users, requiring a steeper learning curve compared to simpler tools like Balsamiq.
Slightly higher price point
  • While Maze offers extensive features, its pricing may be a consideration for smaller teams or those with limited budgets.

Balsamiq vs Maze: At A Glance

Decision FactorBalsamiqMaze
Value to Price
Good4.2
Excellent4.4
Ease of Use
Excellent4.5
Excellent4.6
Functionality
Excellent4.3
Excellent4.7
Scalability
Good4.1
Excellent4.5
Integrations
Good4.0
Excellent4.6
Customer Support
Excellent4.4
Excellent4.3
Security
Excellent4.3
Excellent4.4
Overall Rating
Excellent4.3
Excellent4.5

Balsamiq vs Maze: A Detailed Breakdown of Key Features

FeaturesBalsamiqMaze
Wireframing
Excellent4.8
Good4.0
User Testing
Poor3.5
Excellent4.9
Feedback Analysis
Good3.8
Excellent4.7
Collaboration
Good4.2
Excellent4.5
Prototyping
Good4.0
Excellent4.6
Design Integration
Good4.1
Excellent4.8

Wireframing

Balsamiq is renowned for its wireframing capabilities, offering a simple yet effective platform for creating low-fidelity mockups. Its drag-and-drop interface makes it easy to sketch out ideas quickly. Maze, while not primarily a wireframing tool, offers basic wireframing features but excels more in testing and feedback. If wireframing is your main focus, Balsamiq is the clear winner.

User Testing

Maze shines in user testing, providing comprehensive tools to create tests, gather feedback, and analyze results. Balsamiq, on the other hand, lacks advanced testing features, focusing more on wireframing. If you need robust user testing capabilities, Maze is the better choice.

Feedback Analysis

Maze offers powerful feedback analysis tools, allowing teams to gain insights into user behavior and preferences. Balsamiq provides basic feedback options but doesn't match Maze's depth in analysis. For detailed feedback analysis, Maze is the superior option.

Collaboration

Both Balsamiq and Maze offer collaboration features, but Maze's real-time collaboration tools are more advanced, making it easier for teams to work together. Balsamiq's collaboration is effective for smaller teams, but Maze's capabilities make it better for larger, distributed teams.

Prototyping

Maze provides advanced prototyping features, allowing users to create interactive prototypes and test them with real users. Balsamiq offers basic prototyping, focusing more on wireframing. If prototyping is a priority, Maze offers more comprehensive solutions.

Design Integration

Maze integrates seamlessly with popular design tools, enhancing its usability for design teams. Balsamiq also offers integrations, but Maze's extensive options make it more versatile. For teams relying on design software, Maze's integration capabilities are a significant advantage.

Pricing Comparison of Balsamiq and Maze

To assist you in making an informed choice, we’ve outlined the pricing plans and essential features of Balsamiq and Maze. This comparison will highlight the best option for your design and testing needs.

author image

Balsamiq Pricing Plans

Business
For Small Businesses
$12

per month

Try For Freeright_arrow
Business includes:
  • Create unlimited wireframes for your projects.
  • Invite unlimited users to collaborate on projects.
  • Ideal for small teams starting with wireframing.
  • Flexible billing options: monthly or annually.
Enterprise
For Large Enterprises
$18

per month

Try For Freeright_arrow
Includes Business, plus:
  • Assistance with legal and security forms.
  • Enterprise Service Level Agreement (SLA) included.
  • Annual billing ensures cost-effectiveness.
author image

Maze Pricing Plans

Free
For Individuals
$0

per month

Get Startedright_arrow
Free includes:
  • Up to 7 blocks for comprehensive usability testing.
  • 1 study per month to kickstart your research journey.
  • 5 seats to collaborate with your team.
  • Ideal for individuals starting with usability testing.
Starter
For Small Teams
$99

per month

Try For Freeright_arrow
Includes Free, plus:
  • AI question rephrasing to enhance survey quality.
  • Conditional logic for dynamic survey paths.
  • PRO templates for professional-grade research.
  • CSV export for data analysis and reporting.
Organization
For Large Enterprises
Contact sales
Request Pricingright_arrow
Includes Starter, And:
  • Open card sorting for user-centric information architecture.
  • Tree testing for evaluating site structure.
  • Variant Comparison for A/B testing and optimization.
  • Advanced panel targeting criteria for precise participant selection.

Our Rating Methodology

We thoroughly test each design tool, evaluating key features like wireframing, user testing, and feedback analysis. We also analyze user reviews to ensure our recommendations fit your needs. Each of the seven evaluation factors is weighted by importance to provide an accurate final rating, helping you avoid poor-quality tools and make informed decisions.

Decision FactorScoring Weight
Value to Price
20%
20%
Ease of Use
20%
15%
Functionality
20%
25%
Scalability
20%
15%
Integrations
20%
10%
Customer Support
20%
10%
Security
20%
5%

Balsamiq or Maze: Which One Matches Your Business Needs?

Choose Balsamiq If You Need ...

  • Simple wireframing tool for beginners

    If you are a beginner or small business owner looking for an easy-to-use wireframing tool, Balsamiq is the perfect choice. Its intuitive interface and focus on simplicity make it accessible to users with little design experience.

  • Reliable customer support

    If you value responsive and helpful customer support, Balsamiq is a great option. Its reputation for excellent support ensures that you can quickly resolve any issues you encounter.

Choose Maze If You Need ...

  • Comprehensive user testing capabilities

    If you need robust user testing features, Maze is the ideal choice. Its comprehensive testing tools and feedback analysis capabilities make it invaluable for design teams seeking data-driven insights.

  • Seamless design tool integrations

    If seamless integration with popular design tools is crucial, Maze is the superior option. Its extensive integration options enhance its usability for design teams, making it a versatile choice.

Frequently Asked Questions

author image
Author

Anastasia Belyh

Anastasia Belyh is a senior tech writer with over 15 years of experience in marketing, sales, and business software. Having worked in investment banking, management consulting, and founded multiple companies, her in-depth knowledge and hands-on expertise make her software reviews authoritative, trustworthy, and highly practical for business decision-makers.